Peugeot 106 1996 vs Peugeot 306 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 17.2 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 306 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 106 engine produces 12 HP less power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Peugeot 306. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 106 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 106 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that by driving the Peugeot 106 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 106 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 306 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Peugeot 206, Citroen Berlingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.59 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Peugeot 106 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 106 is 35 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | 1146 litres | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Peugeot 106 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 306 (by 193 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`375 | 1`530 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Peugeot 306 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 306 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 106 has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |