Peugeot 106 1996 vs Peugeot 107 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 95 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.5 seconds | 15.6 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 107 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 106 engine produces 4 HP more power than Peugeot 107, but torque is 35 NM less than Peugeot 107. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.2 l/100km | 4.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 106 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 106 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 106 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 107 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Citroen C1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 107 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 107 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 3.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.59 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.47 m | |
| Peugeot 106 is 25 cm longer than the Peugeot 107, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Peugeot 106 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 106 has 76 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 107. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 106 (by 202 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 107, which means Peugeot 106 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`375 | 1`245 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Peugeot 107 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 106 has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Peugeot 107, so Peugeot 107 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 106 has
|
Peugeot 107 has
| |