Peugeot 106 1998 vs Peugeot 306 1999

 
Peugeot 106
1998 - 2001
Peugeot 306
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 111 NM111 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17 seconds14.7 seconds
Peugeot 106 and Peugeot 306 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.96.9
The Peugeot 306 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Peugeot 106 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 106 could require 150 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
700 km on highway1070 km on highway
Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.68 m4.03 m
Width: 1.59 m1.68 m
Height: 1.38 m1.35 m
Peugeot 106 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Peugeot 106 is 35 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 215 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
953 litresno data
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space.
Peugeot 106 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3151`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Peugeot 306 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 306 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12001000
Pros and Cons:
    Peugeot 306 has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv