Peugeot 106 1998 vs Ford KA 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 111 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
| Peugeot 106 engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford KA, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Ford KA. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 6.7 | |
|
The Ford KA is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 106 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford KA, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 106 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Ford KA gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.59 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.37 m | |
| Peugeot 106 is 6 cm longer than the Ford KA, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 186 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | 724 litres | |
|
Peugeot 106 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 106 has 29 litres more trunk space than the Ford KA. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 106 (by 229 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford KA, which means Peugeot 106 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`315 | 1`265 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Peugeot 106 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford KA has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 106 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 106 has
|
Ford KA has
| |