Peugeot 106 1996 vs Volkswagen Polo 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
| Peugeot 106 and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, but Peugeot 106 torque is 28 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.5 | |
| Peugeot 106 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 106 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.59 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Peugeot 106 is smaller. Peugeot 106 is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | 975 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Peugeot 106 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Peugeot 106 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`295 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 106 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 106 has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |