Peugeot 106 1996 vs Volkswagen Golf 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Peugeot 106 engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Despite less power, Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.9 | |
| Peugeot 106 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that by driving the Peugeot 106 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.59 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Peugeot 106 is smaller. Peugeot 106 is 34 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`295 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 106 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |