Peugeot 106 1996 vs Volkswagen Golf 1997

 
Peugeot 106
1996 - 2003
Volkswagen Golf
1997 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.1 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP75 HP
Torque: 88 NM128 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds14 seconds
Peugeot 106 engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Despite less power, Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.6
Peugeot 106 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 106 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway1030 km on highway
Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.68 m4.15 m
Width: 1.59 m1.74 m
Height: 1.38 m1.44 m
Peugeot 106 is smaller.
Peugeot 106 is 47 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 215 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
953 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): 1`295no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

high
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 106 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 14001200
Pros and Cons:
    Volkswagen Golf has
    • more power
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv