Peugeot 106 1996 vs Peugeot 306 1999

 
Peugeot 106
1996 - 2003
Peugeot 306
1999 - 2001
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.1 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 60 HP75 HP
Torque: 88 NM111 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds14.7 seconds
Peugeot 106 engine produces 15 HP less power than Peugeot 306, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Peugeot 306. Despite less power, Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.9
Peugeot 106 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306, which means that by driving the Peugeot 106 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway1070 km on highway
Peugeot 306 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.68 m4.03 m
Width: 1.59 m1.68 m
Height: 1.38 m1.35 m
Peugeot 106 is smaller, but slightly higher.
Peugeot 106 is 35 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 215 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
953 litresno data
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space.
Peugeot 106 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2951`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Peugeot 306 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 306 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12001000
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 106 has
  • more dynamic
Peugeot 306 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv