Peugeot 106 1996 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 106 engine produces 15 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.9 | |
| Peugeot 106 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Peugeot 106 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.59 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Peugeot 106 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 106 is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | 830 litres | |
| Peugeot 106 has 25 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 106 (by 123 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Peugeot 106 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`295 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 106 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |