Peugeot 106 1996 vs BMW 3 series 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 106 engine produces 42 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 62 NM less than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 106 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 106 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 106 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Peugeot 106 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 106) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.59 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Peugeot 106 is smaller. Peugeot 106 is 53 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 325 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | 1030 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage space. Peugeot 106 has 110 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 77 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.6 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Peugeot 106 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`295 | 1`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Peugeot 106 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Peugeot 106, so Peugeot 106 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 106 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |