Peugeot 106 1996 vs Peugeot 206 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Peugeot 106
1996 - 2003
Peugeot 206
1998 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 1.61.1 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 50 - 118 HP60 - 177 HP
Torque: 74 - 145 NM94 - 205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 - 19.2 seconds7.5 - 15.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 8.84.3 - 7.9
Peugeot 106 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. On average, Peugeot 106 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.68 m3.82 m
Width: 1.59 m1.65 m
Height: 1.38 m1.43 m
Peugeot 106 is smaller.
Peugeot 106 is 14 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 215 litres1070 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
953 litres1130 litres
Peugeot 206 has more luggage space.
Peugeot 106 has 855 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 177 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206, which means Peugeot 106 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`328~ 1`514
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 1200800
Pros and Cons:
    Peugeot 206 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    • better manoeuvrability
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv