Peugeot 106 1996 vs Renault Clio 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 118 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 74 - 145 NM | 93 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 19.2 seconds | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.8 | 5.2 - 7.6 | |
|
Peugeot 106 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Peugeot 106 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.59 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Peugeot 106 is smaller. Peugeot 106 is 9 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | 1035 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Peugeot 106 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 82 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`328 | ~ 1`498 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Clio has
| |