Peugeot 106 1996 vs Peugeot 306 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 118 HP | 70 - 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 74 - 145 NM | 111 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 19.2 seconds | 10.3 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.8 | 5.2 - 9.1 | |
|
Peugeot 106 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 306. On average, Peugeot 106 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 306. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.68 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.59 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Peugeot 106 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 106 is 35 cm shorter than the Peugeot 306, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | 1146 litres | |
|
Peugeot 306 has more luggage space. Peugeot 106 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 306. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 306 (by 193 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Peugeot 306. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`328 | ~ 1`519 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 106 has
|
Peugeot 306 has
| |