Peugeot 106 1996 vs Peugeot 107 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.6 | 1.0 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 50 - 118 HP | 54 - 68 HP | |
Torque: | 74 - 145 NM | 93 - 130 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 19.2 seconds | 13.7 - 15.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.8 | 4.1 - 4.6 | |
Peugeot 106 petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 107. On average, Peugeot 106 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.68 m | 3.43 m | |
Width: | 1.59 m | 1.63 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.47 m | |
Peugeot 106 is 25 cm longer than the Peugeot 107, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 106 is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 139 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
953 litres | 751 litres | |
Peugeot 106 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 106 has 76 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 107. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 106 (by 202 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 106 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Peugeot 107, which means Peugeot 106 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`328 | ~ 1`245 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 106 has
|
Peugeot 107 has
| |