Peugeot 1007 2006 vs Renault Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Peugeot 1007 and Renault Scenic have the same engine power, but Peugeot 1007 torque is 4 NM less than Renault Scenic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 1007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Peugeot 1007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 1007 2006 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 1007 2006 1.6 engine Renault Scenic 2009 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is smaller. Peugeot 1007 is 51 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 154 litres | 437 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 1837 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 283 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 645 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 1007 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`877 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |