Peugeot 1007 2006 vs Ford Fusion 2005
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 146 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Peugeot 1007 engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Fusion, whereas torque is 1 NM more than Ford Fusion. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Fusion is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 1007 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Fusion gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford C-Max, Ford Fiesta | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 1007 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 1007 2006 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 1007 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is smaller, but higher. Peugeot 1007 is 29 cm shorter than the Ford Fusion, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 154 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 1175 litres | |
| Peugeot 1007 has 183 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fusion. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 1007 (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 1007 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Fusion. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`605 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Ford Fusion has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 215 percent more cases than Ford Fusion, so Ford Fusion quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |