Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Renault Modus 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 1007 engine produces 42 HP more power than Renault Modus, but torque is 13 NM less than Renault Modus. Thanks to more power Peugeot 1007 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Modus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 1007 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Modus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 1007 could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 1007 consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Modus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 49 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Modus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 1007 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 1007 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 1007 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 3.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 1007 is 6 cm shorter than the Renault Modus, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 154 litres | 274 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 1283 litres | |
|
Renault Modus has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 120 litres less trunk space than the Renault Modus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Modus (by 91 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 1007 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Modus. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`596 | 1`670 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Peugeot 1007 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Modus, so Peugeot 1007 quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Renault Modus has
| |