Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Renault Kangoo 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 1007 engine produces 15 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, but torque is 1 NM less than Renault Kangoo. Despite the higher power, Peugeot 1007 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Peugeot 1007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Peugeot 206 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.82 m | |
| Peugeot 1007 is 31 cm shorter than the Renault Kangoo, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 154 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 496 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 1007 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`596 | 1`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Peugeot 1007 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Kangoo, so Peugeot 1007 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |