Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 1007 engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Peugeot 1007 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Peugeot 1007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Ford Fiesta, Ford Fusion | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 1007 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 1007 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 1007 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 1007 is 60 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 154 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 396 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 428 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`596 | 1`855 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |