Peugeot 1007 2007 vs Suzuki Vitara 2014
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
Peugeot 1007 engine produces 10 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Despite less power, Peugeot 1007 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 1007 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
970 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
650 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 407, Citroen Xsara Picasso | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 1007 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.73 m | 4.18 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
Peugeot 1007 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 1007 is 45 cm shorter than the Suzuki Vitara, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 154 litres | 375 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 710 litres | |
Peugeot 1007 has 221 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 1007 (by 482 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 1007 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`870 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 12 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |