Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Peugeot 107 2005
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 133 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Peugeot 1007 engine produces 20 HP more power than Peugeot 107, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Peugeot 107. Thanks to more power Peugeot 1007 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 107 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 1007 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 1007 could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 1007 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 107. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 107 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen C4, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 107 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 107 2005 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 3.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is larger. Peugeot 1007 is 30 cm longer than the Peugeot 107, 6 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 154 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 751 litres | |
| Peugeot 1007 has 15 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 107. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 1007 (by 441 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 1007 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 107, which means Peugeot 1007 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Peugeot 107 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Peugeot 107, so Peugeot 107 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Peugeot 107 has
| |