Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Renault Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 1007 engine produces 42 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 1007 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 1007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Peugeot 1007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 1007 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2009 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is smaller. Peugeot 1007 is 61 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 154 litres | 437 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 1837 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 283 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 645 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 1007 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`582 | 1`944 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |