Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Renault Kangoo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 1007 engine produces 3 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, but torque is 10 NM less than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Peugeot 1007 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 1007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 1007 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Peugeot 1007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.83 m | |
| Peugeot 1007 is 27 cm shorter than the Renault Kangoo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 154 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 2600 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 496 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 1408 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 1007 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`582 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Peugeot 1007 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Peugeot 1007, so Peugeot 1007 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |