Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Nissan Cube 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
Diesel (Peugeot 1007) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan Cube) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 HP | 98 HP | |
Torque: | 150 NM | 137 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Peugeot 1007 engine produces 30 HP less power than Nissan Cube, but torque is 13 NM more than Nissan Cube. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 41 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 1007 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Peugeot 1007 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.73 m | 3.73 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 1007 and Nissan Cube are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 154 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 1250 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 1007 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Cube, which means Peugeot 1007 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`582 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Nissan Cube has
| |