Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 1007 engine produces 22 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 1007 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 1007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Peugeot 1007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 1007 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 1007 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 1007 is 60 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 154 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 396 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 428 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`582 | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |