Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Ford C-Max 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 109 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.6 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 1007 engine produces 25 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 1007 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 1007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Peugeot 1007 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 1007 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 510 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
| Peugeot 1007 is 60 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 246 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 304 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 428 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`554 | 1`855 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 1007 has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |