Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 110 HP | 69 - 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 109 - 240 NM | 126 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 17.8 seconds | 13.3 - 20.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.9 | 6.0 - 8.3 | |
|
Peugeot 1007 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Caddy. On average, Peugeot 1007 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is smaller. Peugeot 1007 is 67 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 246 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 2239 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 314 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 1047 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 1007 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy, which means Peugeot 1007 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`577 | ~ 2`024 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |