Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Renault Scenic 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 68 - 110 HP | 110 - 160 HP | |
Torque: | 109 - 240 NM | 151 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 17.8 seconds | 9.1 - 13.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.9 | 4.5 - 7.7 | |
Peugeot 1007 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Peugeot 1007 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.73 m | 4.31 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
Peugeot 1007 is smaller. Peugeot 1007 is 58 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 246 litres | 437 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 1837 litres | |
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 191 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 645 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 1007 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`577 | ~ 1`973 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1800 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |