Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Ford C-Max 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 110 HP | 90 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 109 - 240 NM | 145 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 17.8 seconds | 9.6 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.9 | 4.8 - 8.1 | |
|
Peugeot 1007 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford C-Max. On average, Peugeot 1007 equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is smaller, but slightly higher. Peugeot 1007 is 61 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 246 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Ford C-Max has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 304 litres less trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford C-Max (by 428 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`577 | ~ 1`933 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |