Peugeot 1007 2005 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 110 HP | 90 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 109 - 240 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 17.8 seconds | 10.8 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.9 | 4.9 - 8.7 | |
|
Peugeot 1007 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, Peugeot 1007 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Peugeot 1007 is smaller. Peugeot 1007 is 55 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 1007 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 246 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1192 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage space. Peugeot 1007 has 304 litres less trunk space than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 1007 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Peugeot 1007 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`577 | ~ 1`267 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 1007 has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |