Opel Zafira 1999 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 192 HP | 90 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 280 NM | 178 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 17 seconds | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 10.1 | 7.7 - 9.5 | |
|
Opel Zafira petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Picnic. On average, Opel Zafira equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
| Opel Zafira is 21 cm shorter than the Toyota Picnic, 4 cm wider, while the height of Opel Zafira is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 1840 litres | |
|
Toyota Picnic has more luggage space. Opel Zafira has 35 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 135 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Zafira is 0.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Opel Zafira can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`035 | ~ 2`007 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Zafira has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |