Opel Vivaro 2015 vs Toyota Proace 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Opel Vivaro engine produces 38 HP less power than Toyota Proace, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Toyota Proace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.4 | |
|
The Opel Vivaro is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Vivaro consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Proace, which means that by driving the Opel Vivaro over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1400 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Vivaro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.96 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.97 m | 1.98 m | |
| Opel Vivaro is 15 cm shorter than the Toyota Proace, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1000 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3200 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`960 kg | 2`973 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`665 kg | 1`836 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`295 kg | 1`137 kg | |
| Opel Vivaro load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Toyota Proace. Therefore, Opel Vivaro is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Vivaro has
|
Toyota Proace has
| |