Opel Vivaro 2003 vs Chrysler Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Opel Vivaro engine produces 5 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, but torque is 8 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.7 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Vivaro consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Vivaro could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Opel Vivaro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Opel Vivaro is smaller, but higher. Opel Vivaro is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Vivaro is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3100 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Vivaro is 0.9 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Opel Vivaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Vivaro has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |