Opel Vivaro 2003 vs Skoda Superb 2010
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 135 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
Opel Vivaro engine produces 5 HP less power than Skoda Superb, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 6.1 | |
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Vivaro consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Vivaro could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.96 m | 1.51 m | |
Opel Vivaro is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 9 cm wider, while the height of Opel Vivaro is 45 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | 603 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3100 litres | no data | |
Opel Vivaro has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Vivaro has 597 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Superb. The Skoda Superb may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Vivaro is 1.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Opel Vivaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | 2`132 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 3600 | 7800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Vivaro has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |