Opel Vivaro 2003 vs Kia Pregio 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 227 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Opel Vivaro engine produces 55 HP more power than Kia Pregio, whereas torque is 93 NM more than Kia Pregio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 70 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Vivaro) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Kia Pregio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.98 m | |
| Opel Vivaro is 12 cm shorter than the Kia Pregio, 9 cm wider, while the height of Opel Vivaro is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3100 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`900 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Vivaro has
|
| |