Opel Vivaro 2010 vs Toyota Hiace 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Opel Vivaro engine produces 19 HP less power than Toyota Hiace, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Toyota Hiace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 70 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Vivaro) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Toyota Hiace) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.98 m | |
|
Opel Vivaro is larger, but slightly lower. Opel Vivaro is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Hiace, 21 cm wider, while the height of Opel Vivaro is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3100 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`835 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Hiace has
| |