Opel Vivaro 2010 vs Volkswagen Caravelle 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Opel Vivaro engine produces 54 HP more power than Volkswagen Caravelle, whereas torque is 163 NM more than Volkswagen Caravelle. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 80 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Trafic, Nissan Primastar | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Vivaro might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.94 m | |
| Opel Vivaro and Volkswagen Caravelle are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3100 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Vivaro has more luggage capacity. Opel Vivaro has 660 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Caravelle. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`835 kg | 2`515 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Vivaro has
|
Volkswagen Caravelle has
| |