Opel Vivaro 2010 vs Renault Trafic 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Opel Vivaro engine produces 24 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Renault Trafic. Despite the higher power, Opel Vivaro reaches 100 km/h speed 7.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.9 | |
|
The Opel Vivaro is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Vivaro consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that by driving the Opel Vivaro over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| Opel Vivaro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 20 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.96 m | |
| Opel Vivaro and Renault Trafic are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1200 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3100 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`835 | 2`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Vivaro has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |