Opel Tigra 2004 vs Ford Puma 1998
| Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Puma is a more dynamic driving. Opel Tigra engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Puma, but torque is 48 NM more than Ford Puma. Due to the lower power, Opel Tigra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 7.2 | |
|
The Opel Tigra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Tigra consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that by driving the Opel Tigra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Opel Tigra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.34 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Tigra is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Puma, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Tigra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
440 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Opel Tigra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Tigra has
|
Ford Puma has
| |