Opel Tigra 2007 vs Ford Puma 1997

 
Opel Tigra
2007 - 2010
Ford Puma
1997 - 2002
Body: CabrioCoupe
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.7 Petrol

Performance

Power: 125 HP125 HP
Torque: 165 NM157 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 seconds9.2 seconds
Opel Tigra and Ford Puma have the same engine power, but Opel Tigra torque is 8 NM more than Ford Puma. Opel Tigra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.77.4
Opel Tigra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Tigra could require 45 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle540 km in combined cycle
Opel Tigra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.98 m
Width: 1.68 m1.67 m
Height: 1.36 m1.34 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Tigra is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Puma, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Tigra is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 250 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
440 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Opel Tigra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 26001000
Pros and Cons: Opel Tigra has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Puma has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv