Opel Tigra 2007 vs Ford Puma 1997
| Body: | Cabrio | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Opel Tigra and Ford Puma have the same engine power, but Opel Tigra torque is 8 NM more than Ford Puma. Opel Tigra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.4 | |
| Opel Tigra consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Tigra could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Tigra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.34 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Tigra is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Puma, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Tigra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
440 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Opel Tigra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Tigra has
|
Ford Puma has
| |