Opel Tigra 2004 vs Ford Puma 1998

 
Opel Tigra
2004 - 2009
Ford Puma
1998 - 2000
Body: CabrioCoupe
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP90 HP
Torque: 125 NM122 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.4 seconds11.9 seconds
Opel Tigra and Ford Puma have the same engine power, but Opel Tigra torque is 3 NM more than Ford Puma. Opel Tigra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.07.2
The Opel Tigra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Tigra consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that by driving the Opel Tigra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle550 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway670 km on highway
Opel Tigra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.98 m
Width: 1.68 m1.67 m
Height: 1.36 m1.34 m
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Tigra is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Puma, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Tigra is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 250 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
440 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Opel Tigra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`450no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 26001000
Pros and Cons: Opel Tigra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Ford Puma has
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv