Opel Tigra 1995 vs Opel Adam 2015
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Adam is a more dynamic driving. Opel Tigra engine produces 44 HP less power than Opel Adam, whereas torque is 72 NM less than Opel Adam. Due to the lower power, Opel Tigra reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.9 | |
|
The Opel Adam is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Tigra consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Adam, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Tigra could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.48 m | |
| Opel Tigra is 22 cm longer than the Opel Adam, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Tigra is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 387 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
425 litres | 663 litres | |
|
Opel Adam has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Tigra has 172 litres less trunk space than the Opel Adam. This could mean that the Opel Tigra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Adam (by 238 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`565 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Tigra has
|
Opel Adam has
| |
