Opel Tigra 1995 vs Ford Puma 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Opel Tigra engine produces 3 HP more power than Ford Puma, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Ford Puma. Despite the higher power, Opel Tigra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.3 | |
|
The Ford Puma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Tigra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Tigra could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| Opel Tigra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Opel Tigra is smaller. Opel Tigra is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Puma, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
425 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Opel Tigra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Tigra has
|
Ford Puma has
| |