Opel Tigra 1995 vs Ford Puma 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Puma is a more dynamic driving. Opel Tigra engine produces 35 HP less power than Ford Puma, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Ford Puma. Due to the lower power, Opel Tigra reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.4 | |
| Opel Tigra consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that by driving the Opel Tigra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Opel Tigra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Opel Tigra is smaller. Opel Tigra is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Puma, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
425 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Opel Tigra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`330 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Tigra has
|
Ford Puma has
| |