Opel Tigra 1995 vs Ford Puma 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Opel Tigra is more dynamic to drive. Opel Tigra and Ford Puma have the same engine power, but Opel Tigra torque is 3 NM more than Ford Puma. Opel Tigra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.2 | |
| Opel Tigra consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Tigra could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Opel Tigra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Opel Tigra is smaller. Opel Tigra is 6 cm shorter than the Ford Puma, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
425 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Opel Tigra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`330 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Tigra has
|
Ford Puma has
| |