Opel Tigra 1995 vs Chrysler Sebring 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is a more dynamic driving. Opel Tigra engine produces 113 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 153 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Due to the lower power, Opel Tigra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 10.1 | |
|
The Opel Tigra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Tigra consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Opel Tigra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Opel Tigra is smaller. Opel Tigra is 91 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Tigra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
425 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage space. Opel Tigra has 245 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`330 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Tigra has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |