Opel Tigra 2004 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 - 125 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
Torque: | 125 - 170 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 15.5 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 7.7 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
Opel Tigra petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Opel Tigra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.44 m | |
Opel Tigra is smaller. Opel Tigra is 45 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Tigra is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
440 litres | 1500 litres | |
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Opel Tigra has 85 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 1060 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`473 | ~ 1`978 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 12 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Tigra has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |