Opel Tigra 2004 vs Volvo V40 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Tigra
2004 - 2010
Volvo V40
2016 -
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.81.5 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 70 - 125 HP120 - 245 HP
Torque: 125 - 170 NM220 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 - 15.5 seconds6.3 - 10.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.6 - 7.73.4 - 5.9
Opel Tigra petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Opel Tigra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m4.37 m
Width: 1.68 m1.80 m
Height: 1.36 m1.44 m
Opel Tigra is smaller.
Opel Tigra is 45 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Tigra is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres335 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
440 litres1500 litres
Volvo V40 has more luggage space.
Opel Tigra has 85 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V40 (by 1060 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`473~ 1`978
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 300012 200
Pros and Cons: Opel Tigra has
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv