Opel Tigra 2004 vs Nissan Micra 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Tigra
2004 - 2010
Nissan Micra
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel)1.4 - 1.6 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 70 - 125 HP88 - 110 HP
Torque: 125 - 170 NM128 - 153 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 - 15.5 seconds10.6 - 12.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.6 - 7.76.6 - 6.7
Opel Tigra petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.92 m3.81 m
Width: 1.68 m1.67 m
Height: 1.36 m1.44 m
Opel Tigra is larger, but lower.
Opel Tigra is 11 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Tigra is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 250 litres255 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
440 litres457 litres
Opel Tigra has 5 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 17 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters9.2 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 1.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Opel Tigra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`473~ 1`540
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 26003000
Pros and Cons: Opel Tigra has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Nissan Micra has
  • only petrol engines available
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv