Opel Tigra 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opel Tigra is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mitsubishi Colt is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | 1.5 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 - 125 HP | 109 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 - 170 NM | 145 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 15.5 seconds | 8.4 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 7.7 | 6.6 - 7.1 | |
|
Opel Tigra petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.46 m | |
| Opel Tigra is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Tigra is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
440 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Tigra has more luggage capacity. Opel Tigra has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`473 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Tigra has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |