Opel Tigra 2004 vs Mercedes SLK 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Opel Tigra is available with front wheel drive, while Mercedes SLK can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 5.4 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 70 - 125 HP | 163 - 360 HP | |
Torque: | 125 - 170 NM | 240 - 510 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 15.5 seconds | 4.9 - 8.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 - 7.7 | 8.7 - 12.0 | |
Opel Tigra petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 4.09 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.30 m | |
Opel Tigra is smaller, but higher. Opel Tigra is 17 cm shorter than the Mercedes SLK, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Tigra is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | 208 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
440 litres | no data | |
Opel Tigra has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Opel Tigra has 42 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SLK. The Mercedes SLK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Tigra is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`473 | ~ 1`761 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | high | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Tigra has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |